undergradly.
For-profit College

Charleston School
of Beauty Culture

For-profit College in Charleston, WV. Six-year graduation rate 70%. Median 10-year earnings $17,827.

Verdict Mixed outcomes
Charleston School of Beauty Culture · Campus
Median earnings · 10 yr
$17,827
Median debt at grad
$6,128
Graduation rate
70.3%
Federal loan default
0%

Students who entered Charleston School of Beauty Culture reach a median of $17,827 a decade later, a figure that trails the typical four-year outcome. The six-year graduation rate of 70% is well above average and the clearest sign this school holds onto its students. Median debt at graduation is $6,128, a light load against those earnings.

Earnings: College Scorecard, median ten years after entry across students who received federal aid — completers and non-completers alike.

Green Flags
  • Debt-to-income ratio 0.34 — healthy (below the 0.40 threshold)
  • 3-year loan default 0.0% — below national benchmark
Red Flags

Academics

Full-time retention
70%
Transfer-out rate
0%
Student:faculty
8:1

70% of students finish within six years, putting completion well above the national norm. First-year retention is 70% — the single largest point of attrition on this campus. A 8:1 ratio points to small classes and accessible faculty. This is a for-profit two-year institution. That is not disqualifying, but it does mean verifying accreditation, transferability of credits, and job-placement claims directly rather than trusting the category. At 95 undergraduates, expect a small, closely-held student body.

Financial Aid

Average net price
$11,657
Full-time, first-time undergraduates paying the in-state rate who were awarded grant or scholarship aid
% receiving grants
64%
degree- or certificate-seeking undergraduates
% receiving federal loans
46%
degree- or certificate-seeking undergraduates

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24 · grant and loan rates against 95 degree- or certificate-seeking undergraduates

At $11,657 a year on average after grant aid, cost is low here relative to most undergraduate institutions. Income makes less difference than usual: $11,039 at $0–30k, $15,831 at $110k+. About 64% get grants averaging $9,431, so plan on the possibility of paying closer to full price. 46% of students take federal loans, a middling borrowing rate.

Entering first-year students

A different, smaller group than the rates above: full-time students in their first year of college anywhere. The grant series here also excludes the "other sources" counted in the all-undergraduate figure, so the two are not comparable.

% receiving grants
75%
Average grant
$4,898

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24 · 44 students

Net price by family income

The same students as the headline above, limited to those who received Title IV federal aid — a narrower group, with a lower overall average. IPEDS publishes no combined figure across these bands, so they should not be averaged into one.

Family income band Average net price
$0–30k $11,039
$30–48k $9,314
$48–75k
$75–110k $16,678
$110k+ $15,831

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24

Federal student loans went to 44 of these 95 students, totalling $246,902 — an average of $5,611 each.

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24

Local housing costs

Typical rents near campus (Kanawha County) — budget these against any cost-of-attendance housing estimate.

Studio
$714/mo
1 bedroom
$829/mo
2 bedroom (whole unit)
$1,036/mo

HUD Fair Market Rents (40th-percentile gross rent incl. utilities) · FY2026

Veterans & GI Bill

VA caution flag

Probation or Equivalent or a More Severe Status: Show Cause (Other - Provide unlisted or multiple justifications); School has an accreditation issue

GI Bill students
2
Yellow Ribbon
No
Principles of Excellence
No

VA GI Bill Comparison Tool (Veterans Affairs GIDS)

Compare Charleston School of Beauty Culture with peer institutions

How we evaluate Charleston School of Beauty Culture

IPEDS
US Department of Education
College Scorecard
Post-grad earnings
Census PSEO
Earnings by major
Opportunity Insights
Mobility by institution
Read our full methodology →