undergradly.
Public Community College

Clovis Community College

Public Community College in Clovis, NM. Six-year graduation rate 34%. Median 10-year earnings $34,020.

Verdict Mixed outcomes
Clovis Community College · Campus
Median earnings · 10 yr
$34,020
Median debt at grad
$7,250
Mobility score
2.5
% bottom→top quintile
Graduation rate
34.4%
Federal loan default
0%

Median earnings ten years after entry come to $34,020, below what most undergraduate institutions return — the central fact to weigh against cost here. The six-year graduation rate is 34% — low enough that finishing cannot be treated as the default outcome. Graduates leave owing a median of $7,250 — modest by four-year standards. It also moves people — 2.5% of students climb from the bottom fifth of the income distribution to the top.

Earnings: College Scorecard, median ten years after entry across students who received federal aid — completers and non-completers alike.

Green Flags
  • Debt-to-income ratio 0.21 — healthy (below the 0.40 threshold)
  • 3-year loan default 0.0% — below national benchmark
Red Flags
  • ! Graduation rate 34% — below national average

Academics

Full-time retention
57%
Transfer-out rate
16%
Student:faculty
14:1

A six-year graduation rate of 34% means finishing is closer to the exception than the rule. 57% first-year retention is low enough to be the defining risk of enrolling here. The two rates sit near each other: few students who return for a second year are missing from the six-year completion figure. Transfer-out runs to 16% — common enough at this school that the completion rate is measuring a smaller group than the entering class. At 14:1, students get materially more instructor contact than at a typical public university.

Financial Aid

Average net price
$3,974
Full-time, first-time undergraduates paying the in-state rate who were awarded grant or scholarship aid
% receiving grants
68%
degree- or certificate-seeking undergraduates
% receiving federal loans
6%
degree- or certificate-seeking undergraduates

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24 · grant and loan rates against 1,221 degree- or certificate-seeking undergraduates

At $3,974 a year on average after grant aid, cost is low here relative to most undergraduate institutions. Income makes less difference than usual: $2,226 at $0–30k, $9,470 at $75–110k. About 68% get grants averaging $4,979, so plan on the possibility of paying closer to full price. Federal borrowing is uncommon here at 6% of students.

Entering first-year students

A different, smaller group than the rates above: full-time students in their first year of college anywhere. The grant series here also excludes the "other sources" counted in the all-undergraduate figure, so the two are not comparable.

% receiving grants
88%
Average grant
$5,595

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24 · 109 students

Net price by family income

The same students as the headline above, limited to those who received Title IV federal aid — a narrower group, with a lower overall average. IPEDS publishes no combined figure across these bands, so they should not be averaged into one.

Family income band Average net price
$0–30k $2,226
$30–48k $3,767
$48–75k $4,765
$75–110k $9,470
$110k+

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24

Federal student loans went to 69 of these 1,221 students, totalling $323,732 — an average of $4,692 each.

IPEDS Student Financial Aid · 2023-24

Local housing costs

Typical rents near campus (Curry County) — budget these against any cost-of-attendance housing estimate.

Studio
$757/mo
1 bedroom
$892/mo
2 bedroom (whole unit)
$1,098/mo

HUD Fair Market Rents (40th-percentile gross rent incl. utilities) · FY2026

Veterans & GI Bill

GI Bill students
201
Yellow Ribbon
No
Principles of Excellence
No

VA GI Bill Comparison Tool (Veterans Affairs GIDS)

Compare Clovis Community College with peer institutions

How we evaluate Clovis Community College

IPEDS
US Department of Education
College Scorecard
Post-grad earnings
Census PSEO
Earnings by major
Opportunity Insights
Mobility by institution
Read our full methodology →